“Never accept occupation. This is what we did. Don’t give up.“
– President of Azerbaijan Aliyev to the Ukrainian people
“Putin, your time is coming. Trump is going to kick your ass.”
– U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham
“The Russia hoax will go down as one of the most troublesome events in U.S. history. A President of the United States was falsely accused, and a nation had to endure lies fabricated by rogue personnel within their own Intelligence Community. To this day, our country is more polarized than ever before, and the Russia hoax played a role in that.”
– U.S. Congressman Rick Crawford
Obamagate… “This is beyond politics. Republicans joined with Democrats during Watergate. It was difficult, but done for the good of the nation. If Democrats fail to acknowledge the gravity of this situation, it will damage them beyond repair.”
– James Woods
“…No One, Especially the President, is Above the Law…“
– President Barack Obama
Schumer Shutdown: The Senate MUST work in a bipartisan manner to pass most bills. They need 60 votes to move most bills.
IF the Democrats hold back their votes… they can force a government shutdown.
The Democrats and their leader, Senator Chuck Schumer think a crisis is good for them..not America… good for them… not our economy… but good for them… politically.
If you keep voting for these Democrats…you are part of the problem.
Russia…Just Stop: We can have peace if Russia just stops attacking its neighbors and ignoring internationally recognized borders (all of which Russia recognized at one time or another as well).
Putin and his thugs are committing war crimes, attacking and threatening its neighbors and has the world on the verge of World War III because of their own political and financial ambitions.
We can’t forget… Putin’s Russia is abducting Ukrainian children. Russian authorities say that 730,000 Ukrainian children are currently in Russia. Putin needs Ukrainian children to build Russia’s population and provide new soldiers for the Russian army.
Every parent and grandparent should be outraged. Not only has Putin’s Russia attacked a neighbor, but it has also kidnapped thousands of innocent children. We, the United States, should live up to our agreements and defend freedom & liberty in Europe and against any aggressor.
IF Russia respects its neighbors and internationally recognized borders, we have peace… almost world peace. Think about that.
Obamagate: What Obama and his partisan henchmen tried to pull off is way worse than Watergate… not even close. This truly was as closer to a coup from within than one can image.
EVERYTHING must be disclosed and precautions taken so something like this can never happen again… under any circumstances.
Call it Obamagate, Russiagate, or Spygate… it’s bad and should NOT be ignored or ever happen again!
Read more below and follow me on X & GETTR – @sanuzis
–Saul Anuzis
Click Here for Past Commentary from Saul
Saul’s News Weekly Rewind Video
This Week: Secretary of Commerce Lutnick says Americans will love new tariffs, GOP is flush with cash, and RNC Chairman Whatley to run for North Carolina Senate seat!
Thank You President Trump!
President Trump bent over backwards to give Putin every chance possible to have peace. But it is clear Putin does NOT want peace because of his own failures on the domestic front would doom his presidency.
Putin lied to Trump. Putin tried to play Trump. Putin took advantage of Trump’s willingness to push for peace. Putin thought he could fool Trump once again.
Putin’s most horrific act has been his willingness to kidnap Ukrainian children. The fact is that Christian organizations have documented 19,546 Ukrainian children that have been abducted by the Russians out of Ukraine. Older children are sent to military camps to be brainwashed to fight for Russia. Younger children who have been rescued show signs of sexual abuse.
Russia is abducting Ukrainian children. Russian authorities say that 730,000 Ukrainian children are currently in Russia. Putin needs Ukrainian children to build Russia’s population and provide new soldiers for the Russian army.
Enough is enough. President Trump and NATO have given Putin more time and options than this war criminal deserves.
Join us in thanking President Trump for standing strong and ultimately implementing Peace Through Strength!
President Trump Sets Stage for Midterm Victory
In the wake of President Trump’s unexpected 2016 victory over Hillary Clinton, the Republican establishment was caught unprepared for the 2018 midterm elections.
Key GOP leaders at the time — Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., — urged the president to prioritize repealing Obamacare over enacting his signature tax cuts.
This strategic misstep delayed the economic momentum that could have turned the tide in the 2018 midterms, ultimately costing Republicans the House and leading to a politically motivated impeachment.
Now, President Trump has taken a far more assertive approach. In just his first six months of the new term, he has successfully driven the passage of sweeping, pro-growth tax reforms — widely regarded as a major legislative achievement.
Our latest national survey of 1,000 likely voters (conducted July 9–14, 2025) reveals strong public support for President Trump in the wake of these reforms.
His job approval rating remains solid, Republicans lead in the generic congressional ballot, and optimism about the direction of the country is at its highest level since before the pandemic.
A large majority supports key Trump policy stances, including the deportation of criminal illegal immigrants and preemptive strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Media outlets across the political spectrum, including Newsmax, have acknowledged President Trump’s accomplishments. CEO Chris Ruddy, for instance, gave the president an “A+” for his performance thus far. Still, despite legislative wins and economic improvements, Trump’s approval ratings face a ceiling.
Federal Workers Are Being Held Accountable For The First Time, And They’re Not Handling It Well
Obnoxious and entitled federal bureaucrats’ attempts to resist reform are making it hard to say good things about public service.
Right now, there’s a lot of angst in certain corners about the Trump administration’s attempt to downsize the federal bureaucracy. I say “certain corners” because I don’t think this concern is widely held by American voters, but since I live in a Washington, D.C. suburb there’s a lot of anguished Facebook posts and fretful conversations between neighbors — to say nothing of a sudden increase in housing stock, following years of high mortgage rates suppressing the market.
On one hand, it’s hard to see anyone lose their job, let alone your neighbors. On the other hand, the D.C. area is one of the wealthiest areas in the country because at the bottom of a pyramid of absurdly well-compensated lawyers, lobbyists, and government contractors are about 400,000 federal employees. The average federal employee working in D.C. earns $120,305 in salary alone, not factoring in the federal government’s absurdly generous benefits.
Making things worse, a lot of the D.C. drama is federal workers realizing for perhaps the first time they are not impervious to being fired. Some years ago, a very fetching young woman had a full-time job reporting on the federal workforce. Among her findings: “Eight cabinet-level departments — employing about 486,000 people — did not fire a single employee for poor performance between 1998 and 2003.” Granted, Mrs. Hemingway wrote that story quite a while ago, so I checked to see if things are getting better. According to the Office of Personnel Management’s website, out of 2,313,216 federal employees, last year just 5,988 employees were terminated for discipline or performance reasons, roughly one quarter of one percent. Once you get a federal job, it’s more or less impossible to lose it.
Trump is losing 75% of federal cases challenging his executive actions
President Trump has tamed Congress and largely defanged the federal bureaucracy as he pursues his vigorous second-term agenda, but federal district judges have rushed to the battlements to take him on.
As Mr. Trump crosses the six-month mark in office, he has faced at least 500 lawsuits challenging his executive actions, or a rate of four lawsuits for every business day since Jan. 20.
District judges have made substantive rulings in more than half of those cases, and the results have been grim for Mr. Trump. According to The Washington Times’ Trump litigation tracker, judges have ruled against the president’s position 75% of the time.
About 50 of those cases were part of the administration’s ill-fated effort to boot some foreign students over irregularities in their immigration and criminal records. Mr. Trump lost roughly 90% of those cases.
Still, district judges ruled against the government, either by issuing injunctions or otherwise delaying Mr. Trump’s agenda, a stunning 70% of the time.
Leading the opposition are judges appointed by Presidents Obama and Biden, who have ruled against Mr. Trump’s positions more than 125 times. That works out to more than 80% of the cases on which they have ruled so far.
Chester A. Arthur: Foppish Dupe or Father of the Deep State?
The Deep State wasn’t born in secret—it was sired by a “reformer” president who rigged the rules to protect patronage and planted the roots of today’s unaccountable bureaucracy.
Mr. Andrew C. McCarthy, Esq., has been unequivocal in both his condemnation of the machinations regarding the deceitful weaponization of government known as “Russia-gate” and his conclusion that there is likely no recourse to criminal law to hold accountable two of its key perpetrators: Mr. John Brennan and Mr. James Comey.
In my heart, I hope he is wrong, but in my head, I know he is right. Why? Because the federal bureaucracy and its Deep State are designed for insularity, not accountability. After all, not only has the father of the Deep State never been unmasked for that unconscionable act, but he has also been praised for being a “reformer.”
Following the assassination of President John Garfield by Charles Giteau, who (irony of ironies) was a frustrated office seeker, Chester A. Arthur assumed the presidency. The new president, nicknamed “The Gentleman Boss,” was well versed in the ways of political patronage—er, “administration.” Writing for the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, Dr. Justus Doenecke, Professor Emeritus of History at the New College of Florida, explained:
No president ever came to power who was better equipped to handle the management of a federal bureaucracy than Chester Arthur. His service as quartermaster general for New York and as the collector of the New York Customs House had provided him with a wealth of administrative experience. Those who knew him understood that few men in public life could match his administrative skills.
Russia Investigation – Obama admin ‘manufactured’ intelligence to create 2016 Russian election interference narrative, documents show
‘There was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government,” Gabbard said
The Obama administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise, Fox News Digital has learned.
On Friday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents revealing “overwhelming evidence” that demonstrates how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the years-long Trump–Russia collusion probe.
Documents revealed that in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia was “probably not trying…to influence the election by using cyber means.”
Obama’s ODNI Scuttled Intelligence Briefing To Preserve Russia-Collusion Hoax
Thanks to Director Gabbard, we know more about the depth of the conspiracy.
Internal emails released on Friday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reveal that after former President Barack Obama ordered an intelligence assessment of Russia’s election influence, a top official in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence scuttled the release of an already-completed intelligence report that concluded Russian had not hacked the 2016 presidential election.
On Friday, Director Gabbard released newly declassified documents, including scores of emails related to a 7-page draft President’s Daily Brief or PDB. That draft PDB, dated December 8, 2016, concluded, “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.” But hours before the planned publication of the PDB, the ODNI’s deputy director pulled the report, purportedly due to “some new guidance.”
However, the email threads declassified last week indicate the ODNI instead buried the PDB to provide the intelligence community cover to issue a contrary assessment concerning Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election — and did so, against the recommendations of a wide array of intelligence professionals.
Declassified Records Show Obama Lied To Americans, Sabotaged Transition Of Power
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released 114 pages of newly declassified Obama administration records Friday.
President Barack Obama was among the U.S. leaders directing intelligence agencies to lie about Russians tipping the 2016 election to Donald Trump, reaffirm newly declassified U.S. intelligence records.
The Obama administration’s use of U.S. intelligence to back false claims about Trump and Russia sabotaged the peaceful transition of power necessary for democratic self-government. It denied the American majority the policies they voted for by consuming the first Trump administration with fabricated scandals, including a massive special counsel investigation. These also wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars and damaged U.S. foreign policy, likely feeding the still-raging Russia-Ukraine war.
An unclassified memorandum to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat member of Congress, was released Friday. It quotes newly declassified federal records that demonstrate U.S. intelligence agencies in 2016 believed Russia could not manipulate vote counts in favor of Trump or any other candidate.
It also reproduces formerly classified documents showing that Obama and his top intelligence officials — including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, and FBI Director James Comey — tossed aside such evidence to rush out a doctored “intelligence assessment” that falsely claimed the opposite. Under U.S. intelligence branding, that assessment relied on fabricated information funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely claim Trump was a Russian stooge.
How Obama and cronies created Trump-Russia hoax, and what happens next
Obama and his national security team “manufactured and politicized” phony intelligence to help frame Donald Trump.
Never before in American history has a departing president connived to sabotage and destroy the man who would replace him.
Newly revealed documents show that in 2016 then-President Barack Obama and his national security team “manufactured and politicized” phony intelligence to help frame Donald Trump as a Russian asset when they knew it was untrue.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard who unearthed and released the declassified documents on Friday described it as an “egregious abuse of power” that amounts to a “treasonous conspiracy.”
Treason is a strong term with an exceedingly high legal standard. So, too, is seditious conspiracy. The use of violence or force is often a central element for both.
Closer to the mark are other serious crimes. They include conspiracy to defraud the government and deprivation of rights under the color of law. That is, using knowingly false or fabricated evidence to support a case against Trump and to obstruct or impair a lawful government function such as an election.
The Case for a Constitutional Training Culture in the Military
“I’m not loyal to a president. I’m supporting and defending the Constitution.” This line has become a rhetorical fixture in a growing protest movement embedded within military culture. I was reminded of it again by recent social media posts—some made by people registering their complaints against Trump Administration policies while wearing military uniforms. These are but two of many such examples that came across my screen over the last few weeks, representing a broader trend: veterans cloaking partisan political activism in the credibility of the uniform.
This behavior isn’t spontaneous—it was modeled from above. Consider Gen. Mark Milley’s public defense of introducing Marxist doctrine into the ranks under the banner of open intellectual inquiry, and his braggadocio undermining of the civilian chain of command. We saw another clear example from Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s performance during impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump, in which the U.S. Army officer used the military uniform and rank to veil his partisan antagonism as constitutionally principled service to the nation. Such actions have helped solidify a now-common tactic: using vague appeals to “defend the Constitution” as a partisan bludgeon. This phrase—“I solemnly swear, or affirm, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States”—has taken on distorted meanings in this context, and is increasingly weaponized for political theater rather than solemn service.
Every member of the military has sworn an oath to the nation since the Continental Army’s creation in 1775. Wording to specify allegiance to the U.S. Constitution was added in 1789, and has remained in all versions of military oaths of enlistment and commissioning since. This tradition sets our military apart from many others around the world, where loyalty is often tied to a ruler or regime. The American oath binds service members to a set of ideals and structures greater than any one administration.
Why So Many Seniors Can’t Afford Long-Term Care
Aisha Adkins’ mother Rosetta was adamant that she wanted to age at home. So when Rosetta’s dementia started worsening at age 59, Aisha started looking around for options.
She quickly found that round-the-clock at-home care was extremely costly, and that her mother didn’t qualify for government assistance. Stuck in the middle, Aisha, who was 29 at the time, ended up quitting her job to take of her mother care of her herself.
At first, Rosetta just needed help preparing meals and reminders to take her medication. But as her care needs deepened, Aisha had to learn how to bathe and dress and feed her mother. She and her father hired a home health aide for a few hours a week when they could, but most of the care fell to the two of them until her mother finally qualified for Medicaid through a complicated process called spousal impoverishment protection, which allowed her father to keep some assets.
The Anxiety Over Ukraine’s Entry Into NATO
Both the U.S. and NATO have shown considerable restraint in support of Ukraine against Russia’s invasion by their very measured and incremental provision of armament, succeeding only in prolonging the conflict and continuing the suffering of Ukraine’s civilian population. Reasons for doing so have centered upon the fear of escalation and the perception that they would be drawn into direct military involvement against Russia in what would become a world war. This continuing fear of confrontation with Russia among NATO’s several member nations has not only prevented consensus regarding Ukraine’s admission into NATO but allowed Russia to behave as a rogue entity, committing numerous atrocities in direct contravention of international norms and exposing the weakness of the United Nations.
Moreover, the approach overlooks the fact that North Korea has entered the war providing not only military hardware and munitions but tens of thousands of combatants to engage in military operations against Ukraine. The absence of a defining principle by which the West and NATO have confronted this situation deserves review particularly when eastern Europe is threatened by the actions of a united front of belligerents by the likes of Russia, North Korea and Belarus. The latter has provided logistical support and served as both a training site and staging ground for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine from the outset. Its armed forces have likewise been deployed along Ukraine’s northern border.
One of several reasons Vladimir Putin floated to justify his invasion of Ukraine was the idea that NATO, since 1997, had steadily encroached upon Russia’s western border posing a threat to its security. This reasoning, repeated often enough in the absence of any opposing views in the context of rule by an authoritarian regime, transformed into a call-to-arms in defense of Russia’s homeland. When this became reality with Putin’s 2014 invasion of Crimea and his paramilitary incursion in eastern Ukraine, Europe was alerted to a renewed threat by Russia to again undermine stability of its eastern bloc as it had done after World War II. The threat exploded into outright war with Putin’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine prompting the West to respond with military aid. And so the agony of decision-making began: How much and which armament to supply to Ukraine and when, should Ukraine enter NATO or not, should Russia be allowed to annex partially occupied territory, should we limit Ukrainian incursion in Russia or allow targeting of its civilian infrastructure and how do we deal with Russia’s partners in crime?
A Special Message from Pat Boone
Hello to all my 60 Plus friends.
A few weeks ago, I saw the absolutely shocking new documentary, “A Faith Under Siege,” and I encourage you to experience it as well!
The film details the targeted persecution of the Ukrainian Christian community and the horrifying accounts of the almost 20,000 Ukrainian children from toddlers to teens TAKEN HOSTAGE AND BEING INDOCTRINATED AND FORCED TO TRAIN TO FIGHT FOR RUSSIA AGAINST UKRAINE AND EVEN THEIR OWN FAMILIES!
It’s Orwellian, Sadistic and Demonic. WE, the USA, must act, reveal and rescue those helpless young hostages before they’re hopelessly corrupted. The film includes gripping personal testimonies and actual footage, not hearsay or political propaganda—these wonderful young souls are being savaged perhaps forever! We have to make everyone starkly aware while these kids can be saved.
“A Faith Under Siege” has been broadcast on CBN, Salem, Newsmax and others, but clicking the link below will take you directly to the film where you can watch it now, for free. WATCH: A FAITH UNDER SIEGE You can also access the film through this QR Code:
Your brother,
Final Thoughts
